A liquidity trap occurs under specific conditions, making it challenging for policymakers to revive the economy, especially when interest rates are already low. In this article, you will learn why liquidity traps form and how the government responds to them.
What Causes a Liquidity Trap?
A liquidity trap doesn’t occur quickly like a market crash; it slowly builds as the economy responds less and less to monetary policy. Several factors buoy the slow burn of a liquidity trap, but here are the three biggest influences.
Persistent Low Inflation
Inflation erodes our purchasing power over time, impacting how consumers and businesses spend their money. When inflation is persistently low over extended periods (or even falls into deflation), consumers might put off purchasing high-ticket items since the threat of future price increases is negligible. Low inflation also disincentivizes investment as cash retains value, and businesses and consumers keep money in the bank instead of deploying it. High inflation can destroy wealth, but deflation can grind economic activity to a halt as well.
Consumer Expectations
Consumers don’t often consider their overall economic influence, but public sentiment and expectations absolutely affect markets. Cash hoarding will increase if consumers expect low rates and low inflation to continue. If economic gloom is the prevailing view, consumers will bulk up savings and put less money into their homes, businesses, and brokerage accounts. It’s a bright idea to save for emergencies, but money isn't circulating through the economy when everyone is saving for a rainy day at once.
Central Bank Policies
Policymakers themselves can contribute to liquidity traps by flooding the economy with cheap money. Interest rates are the chief lever central banks use to influence the economy. When they want to rein in the economy, they increase interest rates to make capital more expensive. When the economy struggles, rates are lowered to spur lending and borrowing. But what if rates are already at (or near) zero and demand is still tepid? In that scenario, interest rates would be ineffective in restoring growth. Keeping rates low for too long may also fuel future liquidity traps instead of quieting them.
How Liquidity Traps Affect Economic Policy
Central banks have two primary tools for influencing the economy: interest rates, which we discussed above, and asset-backed strategies like quantitative easing or tightening. When the COVID-19 pandemic kneecapped capital markets, the Federal Reserve dropped rates near zero and added Treasuries to its balance sheet to stimulate activity.
Low rates and central bank asset purchases can spur activity, but these aren’t guarantees. When monetary policy lacks the effectiveness to boost the economy, fiscal policy can be supplemented. Fiscal policy refers to intervention from Congress, which comes in the form of spending and taxes. Monetary policy is more of an indirect instrument, while fiscal policy can be expansive and direct.
The combination of monetary and fiscal policy aided in the United States' recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic, but it also created massive inflationary pressure, and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) reached a four-decade high in the years following the government response.
Liquidity traps highlight the economy's constantly evolving status. Low rates can boost consumers and markets, but if left unchecked for too long, they can cause slowdowns and deflation. Getting economic policy “just right” is a complicated and ever-changing goal, and even the best policy responses can have aftereffects that are either unexpected or take years to materialize.
Historical Examples of Liquidity Traps
Despite the efforts of central banks and policymakers, history is littered with examples of liquidity traps that hurt capital markets and global economies. Here are three scenarios when central bank policy proved ineffective at reviving an economy.
The Great Depression
The biggest economic calamity in history was also one of the best examples of a liquidity trap creating instability. Following the 1929 stock market crash, interest rates began to plummet, but economic activity did not rebound. Despite any Federal Reserve intervention, poor sentiment and deflation persisted, and consumer spending remained depressed until the New Deal financial reforms.
Japan's Lost Decade
A 10-year bear market followed Japan’s real estate crash in 1989, which saw one of the most enormous asset bubbles pop disastrously. Like during the Great Depression, the Bank of Japan slashed interest rates but didn’t get the bump in consumer spending it hoped for. Deflation and poor consumer sentiment continued throughout the 1990s.
The Great Recession
The most recent example of liquidity trap fears came during The Great Recession. Following the 2008 Financial Crisis, the Federal Reserve slashed (and kept) rates near zero for an extended period. However, central banks also embarked on a quantitative easing campaign, buying fixed-income assets to support stocks, bonds and real estate. While not a proper liquidity trap, the aftermath of the 2008 Financial Crisis had all the ingredients: low inflation, low rates, and low consumer spending.
How to Escape a Liquidity Trap
Once the trap is set, how can policymakers provide an escape route? Here are three tools governments and central banks use to break liquidity traps.
Quantitative Easing
During a quantitative easing program, the central bank will purchase assets like Treasuries from other banks, adding to its balance sheets. It pays for these bonds using reserves, which are deposited into the lower banks and used for lending. Since the bank now has plenty of cash reserves and fewer bond holdings, it can offer loans at reduced rates, which encourages borrowing. The opposite is quantitative tightening, when the central bank sells the assets back into the market and reduces the holdings on its balance. Easing adds money to markets through reserves, while tightening removes money.
Fiscal Interventions
Monetary policy can influence markets and the economy, but it's a gentle breeze compared to the hurricane winds of fiscal policy. Unlike the Federal Reserve, Congress can pass spending programs that give money directly to citizens and businesses, like the COVID-era stimulus checks and Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans. Taxes can also be used as an intervention tool, like tax breaks for hiring new workers or building new factories.
While not often used in response to an acute crisis, economic and regulatory reform can also help prevent liquidity traps. The New Deal reforms following the Great Depression were mentioned above, but laws to increase competition, like antitrust policies, could expand economic growth by promoting innovation and fairness. Laws designed to promote financial stability, like bank stress testing and capital requirements, also fall into this category.
Sharpen Your Financial Knowledge with MarketBeat
An investor can do nothing to stave off a liquidity trap, but you can prepare yourself for economic and market uncertainty with MarketBeat's libraries of resources and tools.
Before you make your next trade, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis.
They believe these five stocks are the five best companies for investors to buy now...
